The following is excerpted from the question-and-answer section of the transcript.
(Questions from industry analysts are provided in full, but answers are omitted - download the transcript to see the full question-and-answer session)
Question: Priyanka Grover - JPMorgan Chase & Co - Analyst
: This is Priyanka on for Anupam. Can you review how Revuforj's place in lines of therapy has evolved in the commercial setting during the launch?
And how do you think this will translate for the NPM1 setting? Would physicians with experience with Revuforj be more willing to use it in earlier
lines of therapy?
Question: Corinne Johnson - Goldman Sachs Group Inc - Analyst
: You spoke about a 6- to 12-month range for duration of therapy in 2026. Could you help us think about the key factors that you're looking to
understand in order to narrow that range? And when could that start to be reflected in the revenue trajectory?
Question: Bradley Canino - Guggenheim Securities - Analyst
: Nice commercial momentum on the quarter. First question for you. Have you looked at all where the maintenance restart rate is for the patients
who started revumenib during the first few months of launch? Because obviously, the 35% to 40% you're reporting is weighed down by the bolus
of recent patients getting transplants, but not yet undergoing the ability to get maintenance. So, were you able to do a longitudinal analysis at all
to understand where that restart rate number can grow to?
Question: Peter Lawson - Barclays Services Corp - Analyst
: Just on the delta between quarter-over-quarter growth results versus the Rx rate. And is there any way to break down that gap between gross to
net versus inventory timing that we should be thinking about or any changes that we should be thinking about going forward? And then I've got
a question just on if there's been any friction again NPM1 authorizations and payer access.
Question: Ellen Horste - TD Securities - Analyst
: Congrats on the quarter and all the exciting abstracts. Just wondering a couple of things about the NPM1 launch. One, if you noticed any modest
uptick in the final days of Q3 where you did have that inclusion NCCN Guidelines? And then more broadly, wondering how we should think about
the launch trajectory in the NPM1 population in terms of market penetration relative to the launch in the KMT2A market, given that, as you said,
it's a larger population, but it's likely to face some competition. Any thoughts there would be helpful.
Question: Stephen Willey - Stifel Financial Corp - Analyst
: Just one, I guess, on the soon to initiate REVEAL trial in frontline patients with intensive chemo. I know we don't have protocol details yet, but I was
just curious about how you're philosophically thinking about specifically evaluating the contribution of maintenance therapy within the protocol
itself, just given what J&J now appears to be doing in the frontline setting and whether you think trial design differences may have some kind of
competitive implications on the labeling front as it pertains to maintenance therapy explicitly?
Question: Yigal Nochomovitz - Citigroup - Analyst
: I was just curious, when you look at the trends between the community practices and academic, are you seeing any differences there in terms of
the percent going to transplant? And then related to that, are you seeing any differences in those segments in the percent returning to maintenance
post-transplant?
Question: Yigal Nochomovitz - Citigroup - Analyst
: Okay. And I know you mentioned, obviously, for NPM1, you'll have less transplants. But nonetheless, since the drug was just approved in the
expanded label, -- is there a situation where some patients that did have transplants that were NPM1 could still get Revuforj as maintenance even
if they didn't get it before or that wouldn't happen?
Question: Salim Syed - Mizuho Securities Asia Ltd - Analyst
: Great. Congrats on the quarter, guys. Just one for me as well on the safety side. I know people are focused and you guys mentioned this on the
approval call, the one case of Torsades, it's now listed in the black box there. I know one case, and you mentioned previously, you don't expect
things to really change with it.
And I get that. But as you kind of think about first line here where there are more patients and you are treating thousands of patients per year, is
it not reasonable to think here that you're going to get more cases like that, and that's something that you're going to have to educate or manage
around, especially if zifto does not end up with that on the label?
Question: David Dai - UBS AG - Analyst
: Just a question on the 35% to 40% patients who resumed Revuforj post transplantation in third-quarter . Could you maybe provide some additional
detail around the timing of the maintenance use? How long is the drug holiday before we'll see them coming back to the maintenance therapy?
Question: Mayank Mamtani - B. Riley Securities Holdings Inc - Analyst
: Congrats on strong momentum. Actually, a lot of demand indicators aligned with our recent physician survey. So, on the KMT2A versus NPM1
revenue split being obviously 90 to 10 right now, are you able to comment on when you'd expect that to be a little bit more balanced or even NPM
be a bit more dominant from a timing standpoint?
I obviously recognize there are different dynamics here in play in terms of what you just commented on treatment duration and obviously, transplant
dynamics and obviously, the larger starting patient population. And then I have a quick follow-up.
REFINITIV STREETEVENTS | www.refinitiv.com | Contact Us
consent of Refinitiv. 'Refinitiv' and the Refinitiv logo are registered trademarks of Refinitiv and its affiliated companies.
NOVEMBER 03, 2025 / 9:30PM, SNDX.OQ - Q3 2025 Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc Earnings Call
Question: Mayank Mamtani - B. Riley Securities Holdings Inc - Analyst
: Okay. And on the impressive frontline AML data set from the save all-oral regimen, I believe that was and then the intensive chemo combination.
We also saw a couple of peer frontline data sets that were released this morning. Any updated thoughts on how you're thinking of competitive
positioning and even maybe regulatory strategy with different combination regimen trials in frontline based on some of this data? And the
post-transplant one-year relapse-free rate was 100%, if I heard one-year EFS.
Is that not something you could include in the label at some point? Or would you have to do that post maintenance frontline trial to get there?
Question: Jason Zemansky - Bofa Merrill Lynch Asset Holdings Inc - Analyst
: Congrats on the progress. I was hoping you could speak to the impact of the NPM1 approval on your gross to net and inventory trends as we head
into the fourth-quarter and early next year. Given the size of the population relative to the KMT2A, I have to imagine that some of the headwinds
may pivot to tailwinds and at a much more substantive impact. And then I guess, secondarily, if a patient returns to Revuforj following a transplant,
how challenging is that, at least from an administrative or payer perspective? How difficult is it sort of restarting a patient like that?
|