The following is excerpted from the question-and-answer section of the transcript.
(Questions from industry analysts are provided in full, but answers are omitted - download the transcript to see the full question-and-answer session)
Question: Manav Gupta - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division - Analyst
: My question first is on a little bit on the macro side. How do you view the recent staff proposal by CARB which increases compliance
by 50% by 2030, also has the [AAR] mechanism, which pulls forward the program in case of over generation of LCFS. Do you believe
this will be supportive of RD economics once it kicks in 2025?
Question: Manav Gupta - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division - Analyst
: Okay. I'm assuming you're basically referring to the fact that the [AAR] will pull forward the program into 2024. So the program could
actually start in third quarter 2024?
Question: Manav Gupta - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division - Analyst
: Okay. Very quick follow-up is on Slide [11]. You indicate lower fat sales volume were $32 million year-over-year headwind and lower
protein sales volume were a $13 million year-over-year headwind. Given that integration is going well for both valley and FASA,
should we assume this was just a temporary blip and the volumes will come back as we go ahead?
Question: Paul Cheng - Scotiabank Global Banking and Markets, Research Division - Analyst
: Randy, trying to understand sequentially from the second to third quarter, the Feed ingredient revenue is down. The sales volumes
is actually flat. And all the market indicators, whether it's UCO, tallow or (inaudible) is actually up. We're trying to understand that
what's causing the sequential revenue drop from second to third quarter in the Feed business? That's the first question.
Question: Paul Cheng - Scotiabank Global Banking and Markets, Research Division - Analyst
: And so Brad, should we -- based on that means in the fourth quarter, we should see, comparing to the market indicator, your revenue,
we see more of an upside or then the lag effect is going to take longer than that?
|