The following is excerpted from the question-and-answer section of the transcript.
(Questions from industry analysts are provided in full, but answers are omitted - download the transcript to see the full question-and-answer session)
Question: Hskon Astrup - DNB Markets, Research Division - Analyst
: So 2 questions from me, the first one on solvency. So can you remind us of what management's actions available to improve the solvency ratio
from the current level? And should we expect that we use some of these measures during the second half of this year? That was the first question.
And the second question on dividends, so we are quite clear that we don't have the intention to paying dividend for 2020. At the same time, we
know that on a regional -- currently is quite negative towards dividend payments. So based on your dialogue with the regulator, what conditions
need to be met before you need to pay a dividend for 2020?
Question: Vegard Toverud - Pareto Securities, Research Division - Analyst
: I also have some questions here on solvency. I wondered if you could give us some more details on the 6 percentage point impact from asset
allocation and how potentially you see that developing into the next quarter. That's the first. I have a couple of follow-up questions as well.
Question: Vegard Toverud - Pareto Securities, Research Division - Analyst
: Okay. Very, very clear. You have discussed the difference between the transitional arrangement and the underlying solvency. You are looking at
it. The Board has presented and discussing it, and I believe that, that is previously -- as I was saying, has also looked at both numbers in addition
to a lot of other numbers, of course. When these discussions have been had on the number of the transitional arrangements, have there been any
anchoring towards any specific numbers, such as 100% or 135%? Or has there not been any such anchoring?
Question: Vegard Toverud - Pareto Securities, Research Division - Analyst
: I understand that, and I believe also that the number with the transition is the most important number here. But still, as you told us yourselves
earlier that the number also without transitional arrangements are being discussed. When you are discussing it, are you looking at any specific
numbers or any thresholds for the number without the transitional arrangements as well?
REFINITIV STREETEVENTS | www.refinitiv.com | Contact Us
consent of Refinitiv. 'Refinitiv' and the Refinitiv logo are registered trademarks of Refinitiv and its affiliated companies.
JULY 15, 2020 / 8:00AM, STB.OL - Q2 2020 Storebrand ASA Earnings Call
Question: Vegard Toverud - Pareto Securities, Research Division - Analyst
: Okay. And then just lastly, could you give us some update on estimates now on what the solvency built will be going forward per annum, preferably
with or without business?
Question: Vegard Toverud - Pareto Securities, Research Division - Analyst
: Okay. But to give you then a number. If you're saying that you're building 10 and you're using 5 for normal dividend and you are using then maybe
2 to 3 to account for the lower impact from the transitional arrangement, that would mean that you're building 2 to 3 percentage points of solvency
capital going forward per annum, given that the market stayed the same.
|