The following is excerpted from the question-and-answer section of the transcript.
(Questions from industry analysts are provided in full, but answers are omitted - download the transcript to see the full question-and-answer session)
Question: Robert Justin Marcus - JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division - Analyst
: Marcus, JPMorgan. Congrats on the nice data today. I think a lot of people were struggling to put in context, how do we think about
what are the outcomes in tricuspid patients? What is the acceptable mortality, stroke, adverse event rates -- serious adverse event
rates? And how would you frame these in relation to other alternatives? Or are there other alternatives for these patients?
Ted Feldman
Susheel, do you want to address?
Susheel Kodali
Sure. So I mean, I think we're talking about a population that is fairly sick to start, that we don't have treatment options for. These
are patients that are not surgical. And so when you're talking about nonsurgical patients, we looked at -- these patients were
randomized to medical therapy, where we had a performance goal to look at the safety of the device. We had to derive that
performance goal and, as expected, things -- from something, because there was no predicate device. So we used a surgical series
of 2,000 patients. And using that surgical analysis, we had a performance goal of 43.8. If anything, that performance goal is probably
underestimating what the mortality would be in the population we actually studied. And so the event rates -- the safety profile met
the performance goal.
The question you're asking, what is acceptable? As a position, not as anything else, lower is better. But the bleeding events were less
than we saw before. They were 10% -- only 5% really were related to the procedure. There were -- and what the efficacy will be, we
see elimination of TR. Our hope and my expectation is that when we get the full data set at 400 patients and we get the 1-year
mortality in heart failure, that elimination of TR will translate to a mortality and heart failure/heart surgery benefit. That's hope, right?
But that's what we're studying. And so we just -- we're not -- we need to wait for the full data set for that.
|