...Absolutely. Thank you for starting with a simple question. A question nobody is interested in now. It is a great point. Okay. It's a big thing. One thing is EDA -- I've said this before, like what we do is like computational software. So it's CS+math and has evolved over 30 years without getting into the details. And even my own background is in numerical analysis, okay? And AI will go through the similar evolution, and maybe much faster, but similar. So just to give you an example, when EDA started in the '70s, it was doing dense Algebra, okay, which is the most inefficient way to do things. And then it became spars and became partitioning then latency. They are well-known numerical methods to optimize things, which AI will go through. So when AI started and, of course, last few years, is such a gold rush that things were done, but they were done a little bit brute force in terms of competition, right? It's like a dense multiplying. And EDA used to do dense inverse and then multiply without...
